fix(reliability): hop governance belongs to rfplan, not boot reconciler (I2)
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,10 +1,26 @@
|
||||
"""Boot-time reconciliation of crash-prone PineAP settings."""
|
||||
import time
|
||||
|
||||
from server import (_apply_uci_wanted, _monitor_down, _raise_monitors,
|
||||
PINEAPD_SAFE_UCI, device_run)
|
||||
|
||||
WANTED_EXTRA = {'pineapd.@pineapd[0].autossidpool': '0'}
|
||||
POOL_CLEAR_MAX = 20
|
||||
MONITORS = ('wlan0mon', 'wlan1mon')
|
||||
# pineapd.wlan1mon.hop is intentionally NOT part of the applied set: channel
|
||||
# hopping is owned by the RF role manager (_pause_hop/_resume_hop). Hop=1 is
|
||||
# the healthy recon baseline, so reconciling it here would silently disable a
|
||||
# pager-enabled setting at every boot and latch GUARD PENDING after any
|
||||
# attack-role switch.
|
||||
GR_TTL_SECONDS = 30
|
||||
_GR_CACHE = {'t': 0.0, 'data': None}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _wanted():
|
||||
wanted = {k: v for k, v in PINEAPD_SAFE_UCI.items()
|
||||
if k != 'pineapd.wlan1mon.hop'}
|
||||
wanted.update(WANTED_EXTRA)
|
||||
return wanted
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _pool_size():
|
||||
@@ -16,7 +32,7 @@ def _pool_size():
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def reconcile(clear_pool=True):
|
||||
changed = _apply_uci_wanted(dict(PINEAPD_SAFE_UCI, **WANTED_EXTRA))
|
||||
changed = _apply_uci_wanted(_wanted())
|
||||
pool_cleared = False
|
||||
if clear_pool and _pool_size() > POOL_CLEAR_MAX:
|
||||
device_run(['uci', 'delete', 'pineapd.@ssidpool[0].ssid'])
|
||||
@@ -24,12 +40,20 @@ def reconcile(clear_pool=True):
|
||||
if changed or pool_cleared:
|
||||
device_run(['uci', 'commit', 'pineapd'])
|
||||
raised = _raise_monitors() if any(_monitor_down(m) for m in MONITORS) else []
|
||||
_GR_CACHE['data'] = None
|
||||
return {'changed': changed, 'pool_cleared': pool_cleared,
|
||||
'monitors_raised': raised}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def guard_report():
|
||||
now = time.time()
|
||||
cached = _GR_CACHE['data']
|
||||
if cached is not None and now - _GR_CACHE['t'] < GR_TTL_SECONDS:
|
||||
return cached
|
||||
from server import _pending_uci
|
||||
pending = _pending_uci(dict(PINEAPD_SAFE_UCI, **WANTED_EXTRA))
|
||||
return {'in_sync': not pending, 'pending': pending,
|
||||
pending = _pending_uci(_wanted())
|
||||
report = {'in_sync': not pending, 'pending': pending,
|
||||
'pool_size': _pool_size()}
|
||||
_GR_CACHE['t'] = now
|
||||
_GR_CACHE['data'] = report
|
||||
return report
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -166,7 +166,6 @@ pineapd.wlan2mon.disable=1
|
||||
pineapd.wlan2mon.hop=0
|
||||
pineapd.wlan1mon.bands=5
|
||||
pineapd.wlan0mon.bands=2
|
||||
pineapd.wlan1mon.hop=0
|
||||
pineapd.@pineapd[0].autossidpool=0
|
||||
EOF
|
||||
pool="$(uci_get 'pineapd.@ssidpool[0].ssid')"
|
||||
|
||||
+41
-2
@@ -3,6 +3,8 @@ sys.path.insert(0, os.path.join(os.path.dirname(__file__), '..', 'payload', 'use
|
||||
import server
|
||||
import mk8_guard
|
||||
|
||||
HOP_KEY = 'pineapd.wlan1mon.hop'
|
||||
|
||||
class GuardTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def setUp(self):
|
||||
self.calls = []
|
||||
@@ -30,19 +32,33 @@ class GuardTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
return (0, '', '')
|
||||
mk8_guard.device_run = fake_run
|
||||
server.device_run = fake_run
|
||||
mk8_guard._GR_CACHE['data'] = None
|
||||
|
||||
def tearDown(self):
|
||||
server._iface_up = self.old_iface_up
|
||||
server.device_run = self.old_server_device_run
|
||||
mk8_guard.device_run = self.old_guard_device_run
|
||||
mk8_guard._GR_CACHE['data'] = None
|
||||
|
||||
def wanted_count(self):
|
||||
# Safe set minus wlan1mon.hop (rfplan owns hop), plus WANTED_EXTRA.
|
||||
return (len(server.PINEAPD_SAFE_UCI) - 1 +
|
||||
len(mk8_guard.WANTED_EXTRA))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_applies_all_wanted_when_missing(self):
|
||||
self.pool = 0
|
||||
result = mk8_guard.reconcile(clear_pool=False)
|
||||
sets = [c[2] for c in self.calls if c[:2] == ['uci', 'set']]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(sets),
|
||||
len(server.PINEAPD_SAFE_UCI) + len(mk8_guard.WANTED_EXTRA))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(sets), self.wanted_count())
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result['changed'])
|
||||
self.assertNotIn(HOP_KEY, {c[2].partition('=')[0]
|
||||
for c in self.calls
|
||||
if c[:2] == ['uci', 'set']})
|
||||
|
||||
def test_wanted_excludes_hop(self):
|
||||
wanted = mk8_guard._wanted()
|
||||
self.assertNotIn(HOP_KEY, wanted)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(wanted), self.wanted_count())
|
||||
|
||||
def test_clears_large_pool_only(self):
|
||||
self.pool = 25
|
||||
@@ -55,5 +71,28 @@ class GuardTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
result = mk8_guard.reconcile(clear_pool=True)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result['pool_cleared'])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_report_ignores_hop_and_caches(self):
|
||||
for key, value in mk8_guard._wanted().items():
|
||||
self.uci[key] = value
|
||||
self.uci[HOP_KEY] = '1' # attack-role baseline; must stay ignored
|
||||
report = mk8_guard.guard_report()
|
||||
self.assertTrue(report['in_sync'], report)
|
||||
gets = [c[2] for c in self.calls if c[:2] == ['uci', 'get']]
|
||||
self.assertNotIn(HOP_KEY, gets)
|
||||
n_after_first = len(self.calls)
|
||||
self.assertIs(mk8_guard.guard_report(), report)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(self.calls), n_after_first,
|
||||
'guard_report must serve from cache within TTL')
|
||||
mk8_guard._GR_CACHE['t'] -= mk8_guard.GR_TTL_SECONDS * 2
|
||||
mk8_guard.guard_report()
|
||||
self.assertGreater(len(self.calls), n_after_first)
|
||||
# reconcile mutates live state; it must invalidate the cached report.
|
||||
mk8_guard.guard_report()
|
||||
n_cached = len(self.calls)
|
||||
mk8_guard.reconcile(clear_pool=False)
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(mk8_guard._GR_CACHE['data'])
|
||||
mk8_guard.guard_report()
|
||||
self.assertGreater(len(self.calls), n_cached)
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == '__main__':
|
||||
unittest.main()
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -32,6 +32,8 @@ class ReliabilityApiTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
|
||||
def tearDown(self):
|
||||
server.device_run = self.old_device_run
|
||||
import mk8_guard
|
||||
mk8_guard._GR_CACHE['data'] = None
|
||||
|
||||
def test_h_health_exposes_reliability_feed(self):
|
||||
status, h = server.h_health(None)
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user